Alternative medicine practice for ear cleaning
General information
Alternative medicine
History
Terminology
Alternative veterinary medicine
Quackery (health fraud)
Rise of modern medicine
Pseudoscience
Antiscience
Skepticism
Scientific
Therapeutic nihilism
Fringe medicine and science
Acupressure
Acupuncture
Alkaline diet
Anthroposophic medicine
Apitherapy
Applied kinesiology
Aromatherapy
Association for Research and Enlightenment
Auriculotherapy
Bates method
Black salve
Bodywork
Bone-setting
Bowen technique
Breathwork
Camel urine
Fake COVID-19 treatments
Cancer treatments
Charcoal cleanse
Chelation therapy
Chiropractic
Chiropractic treatment techniques
Vertebral subluxation
Christian Science
Chromotherapy
Colon cleansing
Coffee enema
Colorpuncture
Colloidal silver
Conversion therapy
Craniosacral therapy
Crystal healing
Cupping therapy
Dental amalgam controversy
Detoxification
Foot detox
Dry needling
Ear candling
Energy medicine
Correactology
Esoteric energy
Therapeutic touch
Estrogen dominance
Fabunan Antiviral Injection
Facilitated communication
Feldenkrais Method
Functional medicine
Hair analysis
Herbal medicine
Holistic dentistry
Hologram bracelet
Homeopathy
Bach flower remedies
Biological terrain assessment
Hydrotherapy
Hypnotherapy
Iridology
Ionized jewelry
Jilly Juice
Lightning Process
Lymphotherapy
Medical intuitive
Mesmerism
Magnet therapy
Manual therapy
Megavitamin therapy
Mind–body interventions
MMS
Myofascial release
NAET
Naturopathy
Oil pulling
Orgone
Orthomolecular medicine
Orthopathy
Osteomyology
Osteopathy
Ozone therapy
Parapsychology
Phrenology
Postural Integration
Psychic surgery
Psychodermatology
Quantum healing
Radionics
Rapid prompting method
RBOP
Reiki
Reflexology
Rolfing
Scientific racism
ThetaHealing
Thought Field Therapy
Urophagia
Vaginal steaming
Vision therapy
Vitalism
Vegetotherapy
Young blood transfusion
Zero balancing
Conspiracy theories
Big Pharma conspiracy theories
HIV/AIDS denialism
OPV AIDS hypothesis
Anti-vaccinationism
in chiropractic
Vaccines and autism
MMR vaccine and autism
Water fluoridation controversy
COVID-19 misinformation
Classifications
Alternative medical systems
Mind–body intervention
Biologically based therapy
Manipulative methods
Energy therapy
Traditional medicine
African
Muti
Southern Africa
Ayurveda
Dosha
MVAH
Balneotherapy
Brazilian
Bush medicine
Cambodian
Chinese
Blood stasis
Chinese herbology
Dit da
Gua sha
Gill plate trade
Long gu
Meridian
Moxibustion
Pressure point
Qi
San Jiao
Tui na
Zang-fu
Chumash
Curandero
Faith healing
Hilot
Iranian
Jamu
Kayakalpa
Kambo
Japanese
Korean
Mien Shiang
Mongolian
Prophetic medicine
Shamanism
Shiatsu
Siddha
Sri Lankan
Thai massage
Tibetan
Unani
Vietnamese
Diagnoses
Adrenal fatigue
Aerotoxic syndrome
Candida hypersensitivity
Chronic Lyme disease
Electromagnetic hypersensitivity
Heavy legs
Leaky gut syndrome
Multiple chemical sensitivity
Wilson\'s temperature syndrome
vte
Ear candling, also called ear coning or thermal-auricular therapy, is a pseudoscientific alternative medicine practice claiming to improve general health and well-being by lighting one end of a hollow candle and placing the other end in the ear canal. Medical research has shown that the practice is both dangerous and ineffective and does not functionally remove earwax or toxicants, despite product design contributing to that impression.
Ear candling appears to be popular and is heavily advertised with claims that could seem scientific to lay people. However, its claimed mechanism of action has not been verified, no positive clinical effect has been reliably recorded, and it is associated with considerable risk. No evidence suggests that ear candling is an effective treatment for any condition. On this basis, we believe it can do more harm than good and we recommend that GPs discourage its use.
A 2007 paper in American Family Physician said:
Ear candling also should be avoided. Ear candling is a practice in which a hollow candle is inserted into the external auditory canal and lit, with the patient lying on the opposite ear. In theory, the combination of heat and suction is supposed to remove earwax. However, in one trial, ear candles neither created suction nor removed wax and actually led to occlusion with candle wax in persons who previously had clean ear canals. Primary care physicians may see complications from ear candling including candle wax occlusion, local burns, and tympanic membrane perforation.
The Spokane Ear, Nose, and Throat Clinic conducted a research study in 1996 which concluded that ear candling does not produce negative pressure and was ineffective in removing wax from the ear canal. Several studies have shown that ear candles produce the same residue when burnt without ear insertion and that the residue is simply candle wax and soot.
As of 2008, there are at least two cases in which people have set their houses on fire while ear candling, one of which resulted in death.
A survey of ear, nose and throat surgeons found some who had treated people with complications from ear candling, and that burns were the most common.
Procedure
One end of a cylinder or cone of waxed cloth is lit, and the other is placed into the subject\'s ear. The flame is cut back occasionally with scissors and extinguished between five and ten centimeters (two to four inches) from the subject.
The subject is lying on one side with the treated ear uppermost and the candle vertical. The candle can be stuck through a paper plate or aluminium pie tin to protect against any hot wax or ash falling onto the subject. Another way to perform ear candling involves the subject lying face up with the ear candle extending out to the side with a forty-five-degree upward slant. A dish of water is placed next to the subject under the ear candle.
Proponents claim that the flame creates negative pressure, drawing wax and debris out of the ear canal, which appears as a dark residue.
An ear candling session lasts up to one hour, during which one or two ear candles may be burned for each ear.
Treatment is also performed by some naturopaths in Canada, although import and sale are prohibited by Health Canada. Jonathan Jarry from the Office for Science and Society says that the Association des naturopathes agréés du Québec (ANAQ) states in its code of ethics that \"its members can only use natural health products that conform to the rule of Health Canada\". Results from an inquiry performed by Jarry showed that out of 50 naturopaths in Quebec, two offered the treatment and five said the consumer should buy the candles and do it himself. Only one said that the use of ear candles is unethical.
Conventional removal of earwax
The conventional removal of earwax in medicine is done through an apparatus which creates a vacuum with which a doctor can remove excess earwax through suction. If the patient has a skin problem or the earwax is too sticky, an oil can be used to solubilise it so that excess earwax can be wiped off without inserting any object into the ear canal such as a cotton swab, which can damage the ear canal.
Product regulations
In Europe, some ear candles bear the CE mark (93/42/EEC), though they are mostly self-issued by the manufacturer. This mark indicates that the device is designed and manufactured so as not to compromise the safety of patients, but no independent testing is required as proof.
While ear candles are widely available in the US, selling or importing them with medical claims is illegal. This means that one cannot market ear candles as products that \"Diagnose, cure, treat, or prevent any disease\".
In a report, Health Canada states \"There is no scientific proof to support claims that ear candling provides medical benefits. ... However, there is plenty of proof that ear candling is dangerous\". It says that while some people claim to be selling the candles \"for entertainment purposes only\", the Canadian government maintains that there is no reasonable non-medical use, and hence any sale of the devices is illegal in Canada.
In a paper published by Edzard Ernst in the Journal of Laryngology & Otology, the cost of practicing ear candling according to the recommended frequency of use is estimated. As each candles costs US$3.15 (adjusted for inflation), the annual cost of the treatment would amount to US$982.00 (also adjusted for inflation). The author calls the continued practice of the treatment \"a triumph of ignorance over science ... or perhaps a triumph of commercial interests over medical reasoning.\"
Origin
Although Biosun, a manufacturer of ear candles, refers to them as \"Hopi\" ear candles, there is no such treatment within traditional Hopi healing practices. Vanessa Charles, public relations officer for the Hopi Tribal Council, has stated that ear candling \"is not and has never been a practice conducted by the Hopi tribe or the Hopi people.\" The Hopi tribe has repeatedly asked Biosun, the manufacturer of \"Hopi Ear Candles\", to stop using the Hopi name. Biosun ignored the request for over a decade until sometime after 2014 when the product was rebranded as \"traditional earcandles\" in Germany although the product is still marketed by third-party US resellers as \"Hopi\".
Many advocates of ear candles claim that the treatment originates from traditional Chinese, Egyptian, or North American medicine. The mythical city of Atlantis is also reported to be the origin of this practice.
